New on-campus football stadium is the right idea for Colorado State

By Cris Tiller
Updated: 02/06/12 9:27pm
  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

 
Possibly Related

Right now, CSU doesn’t have a well-defined identity to the outside world.

The CSU community can argue how great an academic institution we are with programs like the veterinary school, but the truth is, unless you want to be a veterinarian, you don’t care.

I know the College of Business is quickly becoming a strong element to the university’s “selling points” and there is the College of Engineering, but think about what you were like as an incoming freshman.

For the most part, a majority of recent high school graduates don’t know what they want to do. And let’s be honest, it’s not a great idea to bank on 18-year-olds knowing what they want to do with their lives.

So how do we create an identity that reaches a broader audience to draw in those young people?

The answer is a new football stadium, and not only a new stadium, but an on-campus stadium. CSU President Tony Frank and new Athletic Director Jack Graham believe this will help.

And they’re right.

Whether you’d like to believe it or not, our athletic program is the only way to truly reach a national audience on an extensive scale.

During Friday night’s On-campus Stadium Advisory Committee meeting, Frank asked the committee to “dream big.” He stressed that athletics, for better or worse, are a way for the outside world to perceive the worth of a university.

Graham has frequently referred to CSU as “a well-kept secret” — one he would like to get out to the world. Graham made it clear that this stadium isn’t just about winning football games like many of his detractors believe.

“It’s a blast to win football games, but that’s not the endgame,” Graham said Friday night. “It’s the means to an end.”

Graham gave five valid reasons as to why building an on-campus stadium is in the best interest for CSU.

Obvious reasons surrounded the football program, like building gameday traditions (something CSU needs terribly) and attracting quality coaches and players.

But he brought up reasons I hadn’t really considered and I doubt others have as well.

An on-campus stadium can help the Fort Collins community just as much as it can help the university. Right now Hughes Stadium sits on the edges of town with literally nothing around it but houses and foothills. People show up maybe to tailgate, watch the game and then they go home.

There are no businesses or any incentive to stick around after the game. An on-campus stadium puts fans right smack in the middle of town with Old Town a short walk or drive away. People can go out before the game, go to the game and go back out after.

Think of all the extra business that could be done with 50,000 to 60,000 people in the same area. Graham forecasted the earnings to be around $6 million annually based on research done at similar schools with on-campus stadiums.

Finally, don’t limit the stadium to just football. Think of Hughes now. We play six home games a year and for the other 359 days it sits dormant.

A new stadium can host other sporting events, concerts or a number of other uses. Our new stadium can be a “landmark gathering place” as Graham put it, similar to Lambeau Field in Green Bay, Wisc.

He had several grand ideas like putting in an Apple store or a Starbucks and even proposed the idea of using luxury boxes like condos, which is how South Carolina uses its on-campus stadium.

The point is, an on-campus stadium presents far more options than a place to host football games. So doesn’t a little extra noise one night a week for a few months and slightly heavier traffic seem like a small price to pay?

Like Frank urged the committee, I urge you, “Don’t forget to dream big.”

Sports Editor Cris Tiller can be reached at sports@collegian.com.

Published February 6, 2012 in Opinion, Sports

6 comments

debrobst

February 6, 2012 at 2:51 PM
Flag this comment

Check your facts Mr. Tiller…South Carolina’s stadium is NOT on campus, it’s about a mile away. That’s why they have plenty of room for toys for their fanatical fans.

See: http://columbiahg.com/2010/09/tailgating-traditions/

Read more …

You most likely just assumed it was on campus since Mr. Graham conveniently left that bit of information out on Friday evening. Similar things could be done with Hughes since there is so open space there, not so on campus.


SonOfLiberty

February 6, 2012 at 6:35 PM
Flag this comment

I believe the discussion with luxury boxes doubling as condos was tossed out as a potential way to help finance the stadium, and as a way of making sure such a facility would be used year round rather than on a handful of Saturdays. I never got the impression AD Graham was using that as a selling point for the stadium itself, he was not saying “Hey lets build this thing because we can put sweet condos in the luxury boxes!”

This stadium is an excellent idea. It has the potential to really put CSU on the map athletically. And there is no reason the city of Fort Collins could not also benefit from such a project. But this stadium needs to happen if CSU wants to improve itself athletically. All those great years under Lubick and no power conference sniffed CSU. Why? Because of an uncommitted administration and substandard facilities. Now we have an administration with a vision. Now we need to improve our facilities and our performance on the field. Do this, or guarantee CSU gets left behind. It is as simple as that.


CSU grad who lived in Columbia SC

February 6, 2012 at 6:38 PM
Flag this comment

Having lived in Columbia SC…Williams Brice Stadium, though approximately one mile from the CENTER of campus…is STILL within the borders of the university. Walking one mile to the games has been a tradition of sorts for students there…if Hughes was a mile away, I doubt we are having this debate….as it would be close enough to draw folks to campus…proximity/location is crucial to events and attendance, as is having a good product, which CSU is committed to having with Football and all its sports programs.

Respectfully Deb…your issue with the stadium is not based on reason or fact, but a disdain for CSU and Athletics.

Read more …

So before you attack folks for the facts…I suggest you get real about what it is that angers you so much about a proposal and inquiry into building a stadium on CSU property, with private dollars. It can’t be because CSU doesn’t support academics…because $500M says CSU does!

Did you contribute Deb to that fund? Did you have the same distaste for other buildings/construction on campus? If you do/did, at least you are principled. But from what I have read, you are intellectually dishonest, and possess an agenda far more devious and harmful than Jack Graham and Dr. Frank wanting to enhance and improve the image of Colorado State University.

Please Deb, you and all the opposed, give a real legitimate reason and concern you have that does not involve myths and dislikes, and then maybe we can have a rational conversation. Until then, unless you donate to CSU, or support as a volunteer, or work for the university, your opinion is worthless…and you do more harm to your own cause by coming across as bitter, angry, and petulant.

I love CSU for its academics and athletics…it can and should be Top Tier in both!

Dream Big!


CSU employee

February 7, 2012 at 9:06 AM
Flag this comment

It’s good to see that our priorities are straight. Academic departments are on hiring freeze, student:faculty ratios are through the roof, teaching is increasingly neglected as a staple of the university… but if something about athletics comes up.. well here come the supporters! Think about it – when this university is abandon because no one is learning anymore, no one will care about a football team. Not to mention, once the campus becomes cramped and congested due to a new stadium, it will look FOOLISH to see what was done for something that will be used 7 times in a YEAR. Pathetic.


RamLog

February 7, 2012 at 12:08 PM
Flag this comment

Wow!such well though out arguments “CSU Employee”. How did you get a job with the university? Simply amazing that moron like yourself would actually post these uneducated remarks. Us people that support this stadium, also supported the $500M facility improvements that are in progress on the academic side. Way to think with blinders on. That will get you far in life!

1. The athletics facilities will be paid for via private funds. Your fight isn’t here, it is with the general budget if you are worried about layoffs.

Read more …

2. Also, as the article states, there will be MANY uses for the stadium outside of football, including a potential new lacrosse team, concerts, band practice space, special events, etc.

I think CSU needs to screen its employees a litytle better so we don’t continue to see posts like the one from “CSU Employee”


Matt

February 8, 2012 at 4:17 PM
Flag this comment

On the other hand, perhaps their comment proves better than anything that CSU needs to spend money on better employees…

A few other comments, all of which should be recognized by anyone who has been on campus in recent years:

Read more …

1) CSU isn’t interested in spending money on academic pursuits? Then why have they put hundred of millions of dollars into a Computer Science building, a Behavioral Sciences building, an under-construction Engineering building, and planned upgrades to the Natural Resources building? Not to mention the technological updates they made in Clark and Eddy along with the aesthetic facelifts. New buildings don’t fix everything, and paying the faculty is important, but they serve different purposes. Better facilities encourage better students to come here, better faculty makes them learn more while they’re here. And to be honest, the hiring freeze and other academic finance issues don’t reflect directly on the quality of the faculty anyway. A state school with almost no state funding is always going to have issues with day-to-day issues like that.

2) This is not a case of spending on athletics INSTEAD of academics.The choice isn’t “collect $200 million for academics, or collect $200 million for academics.” Different donors will give for different reasons, and athletics are one of the best ways for alumni to stay connected to their university. When I graduate and (probably) live in another state, I’m not going to be around in the classroom. I’m not going to know the faculty and the students. I’m going to know the sports teams though.

3) The Campaign for CSU never happened, right? That was a dream, no? Because if it was real then all the people saying CSU doesn’t care about improving academics are going to be PISSED.

 

Comments are closed for this item.

Powered by Detroit Softworks