Colorado State on-campus stadium committee has first meeting

By Allison Sylte
Updated: 02/06/12 12:13pm
  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

 

CSU President Tony Frank, left, and Vice President for University Operations Amy Parsons prepare themselves for the first Stadium Advisory Committee meeting Friday evening. Frank and Parsons are part of this committee that will help determine the direction the on campus stadium proposal will take.

Possibly Related

Athletics Director Jack Graham wants the proposed on-campus stadium to be more than simply a venue for the football team.

Instead, he envisions it featuring condos, dorms, an alumni center, a Starbucks and even an Apple Store — things aimed at generating capitol and excitement around the new project.

“We do nothing with Hughes other than play football there six times a year,” Graham said Friday night during the first meeting of the Stadium Advisory Committee, which he will co-chair.

The meeting, which was held in the Lory Student Center North Ballroom, drew a standing-room-only crowd of CSU students and Fort Collins community members — about 30 of whom were sporting “Save Our Stadium” stickers in protest.

“It seems like a good idea,” said Marc Rope, a Fort Collins resident and “Save Our Stadium” supporter. “But I just don’t understand why they can’t do all of these things [Jack Graham] wants with the facility we already have. This whole ‘on-campus stadium’ thing just seems like a done deal to me.”

That very idea was disputed by CSU President Tony Frank during his opening remarks, when he said that the intent of the stadium committee is to research, discuss and recommend whether or not the project is feasible, not to actually start the process of building.

“If this committee determines the stadium is possible, that’s when the real work begins,” Frank said. “… [in this process] you not only need to dream big, you need to question, you need to challenge.”

Once the committee has determined the project’s feasibility, they are to give Frank a recommendation for whether or not it should proceed by a preliminary end of spring semester deadline.

Both Frank and Graham argued that the key justification for constructing the stadium is to increase CSU’s nationwide visibility to attract out-of-state students, a strategy Frank wants to pursue in order to maintain accessibility for in-state students.

Despite not being directly involved with the committee’s process, Frank did offer a few guidelines: that the stadium doesn’t go on the university’s greenspace, interfere with views, disturb neighbors or use funds from state appropriations or student fees.

While he didn’t address any of the funding solutions he had in mind for the stadium project, Graham, during an hour-long presentation, did say, “I don’t believe we can achieve our objectives [as an athletic program] by continuing to play at Hughes Stadium in the long-run.”

“I think that an on-campus stadium can unify our community in a way it’s never been before,” he added. “… “It’s a blast to win football games, but that’s not the endgame. It’s the means to an end.”

His key argument for building involved fostering alumni engagement and tradition — something he believes that the university is currently lacking. The stadium, he said, will serve as a centerpiece for the CSU and Fort Collins communities and with a central location, will boost the town’s economy.

“This project will be completely linked to alumni,” Graham said.

During her remarks, Vice President for University Operations and committee co-chair Amy Parsons said her biggest goal is to “engage our colleges and students in this process,” adding that she hopes to get students in the College of Business involved in different feasibility studies as the discussions move forward.

The Center for Public Deliberation, an impartial organization, will be charged with facilitating discussion between community members and the public as the committee moves forward. During Friday’s meeting, the Center handed out comment cards for the public.

Parsons said she envisions the committee meeting publicly monthly, punctuated with more frequent subcommittee meetings.

Despite assurances that the committee is going to be as transparent as possible, after the meeting, Rope said he still wasn’t quite convinced.

“I think it’s going to be an uphill battle to try and persuade [the committee] that this project isn’t in the best interest of Fort Collins,” Rope said. “… it feels like this thing is already a done deal.”

“The last thing I want through this process is that it polarizes the community,” Graham said.

Content Managing Editor Allison Sylte can be reached at news@collegian.com.

Published February 5, 2012 in News

5 comments

P.C. Edwards

February 7, 2012 at 7:57 PM
Flag this comment

http://subscr.ramnation.com/news_archive/showArticle-1244.php every one might find this article relevant hmmmmm


Jordan Beer

February 9, 2012 at 10:08 AM
Flag this comment

Any student you talk to will agree that the larger on campus stadium will be amazing. This move will increase national attention and increase student and community attendance. It will boost the local economy and create many future revenue streams for the city of Fort Collins. CSU is already becoming larger than CU and is bordering the largest university in the state. It’s now time to become the greatest university in the state. A university that not only xcels in its acadedmics but also its athletics. Everyone knows that the fans in fort collins are engaged and ecstatic about our programs. If you have attended a basketball game this season then you know what I am talking about. Building an on campus stadium is where all it starts and where we can begin to establish ourselves as a competitor once again. This is a new era in CSU athletics and for the entire community and the City of Fort Collins. The time is now and if we wait too long we will not have the opportunity to do something like this for possibly 20 years from now. And I would like to see my Alma Mater return as a championship competitor in my lifetime.


jimmy

February 9, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Flag this comment

“A university that not only xcels in its acadedmics but also its athletics”

Yep definitely no need to improve the academics of the university… hahahahaha


CSU alum

February 10, 2012 at 10:41 AM
Flag this comment

If CSU had a decent athletic program it would have been in the PAC-12 by now which would have allowed CSU to join the PAC-12 research group. This would have helped the academic side of the university. As someone who has been in the workforce awhile I know for fact most out of state employers hire about schools they have heard about since CSU does not have a decent athletic program it does lower the value of their degree.


jimmy

February 10, 2012 at 3:08 PM
Flag this comment

@csu alum

I am glad you think a shitty football team lowers the value of your degree. As someone who hires people regularly, I don’t even take into consideration what school someone goes to. That is such nonsense. Out of state employers? who the hell is hiring out of state and bases their hiring process off which university one attends? That is total nonsense. OMG you went to CSU, yuck im hiring the CU student cause they were better at football…. sounds like an excuse i would tell an ignoramus that didnt fit the cut, sorry bro your school sucked at football and I cant hire you….. Funny how I employ people who went to Syracuse, CU, Vanderbilt, Oregon, etc… but I went to CSU, my degree clearly counts for less, oh and btw a degree is totally what gets you a job. Interviews, experience, and personality have nothing to do with getting employed.

 

Comments are closed for this item.

Powered by Detroit Softworks