RMSMC
URL: http://www.collegian.com/index.php/article/2011/01/012411_sterncolumn
Current Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:07:12 -0600
Stern: Our government legalized fraud
Corruption, we have all been witness to the practice to previously unknown levels.
Ignore the hiring of a former governor known to lie directly to columnists for the very institution that hired him. Ignore increases in traffic citations during times of decreased tax revenues coast-to-coast.
I will even go so far as to ignore the obvious corruption in professional sports; I’m talking about systemic corruption at the highest levels of government.
In 2003, the incompetent Bush administration attempted to push Congress to create a new regulator over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the sizes of which could create a potentially dangerous situation should housing prices fall.
Care to guess which party-of-change objected?
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-CA, provided several responses during those hearings you can find on YouTube. She not only called the leadership of Frank Raines “outstanding,” she also stated definitively her opinion they were trying to “fix what isn’t broke.”
Fast forward eight years, not only is Rep. Waters still allowed in front of a camera, but Democrats last week elected her, “Ranking Member of the Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises Subcommittee.” Far be it from me to criticize either of our two parties. Did we not learn enough lessons about electing incompetence in the last three presidential elections?
It gets worse, not only is Rep. Waters failing upwards – a common trend in the federal government – but the rest of our elected representatives in Congress, and the White House, are actively carrying out the legalization of fraud.
We all know housing prices went down like a – editor’s note: analogy deleted – but what we seem to have missed collectively is Congress’ hand in the inflation of the bubble as well as the hand job they gave to the bankers.
Let me be clear, this is both parties, and only a single digit number of representatives are not culpable.
Follow the bouncing ball.
Congress passed the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992: This led to “innovative” loans, according to Rep. Waters, including desktop underwriting and 100 percent loans.
This act began pumping pure, organic methane into the housing bubble. As we are well aware, banks began using reckless loans, conning the poor, ignorant and illiterate – and middle class folks looking to move into upper class neighborhoods – into taking bad mortgages to buy dream homes they could not legitimately afford, etc.
Sometime in early 2007 the bubble burst. I happen to believe it was the sale of my home in Utah for a great deal more than I paid for it that burst the bubble; had my house sold a week later, it would have sold for $10-15,000 less.
“CON”gressional representatives have two problems with an economic crisis threatening to destroy banks. First, economic downturns result in ousted incumbent politicians. Second, you cannot very well take campaign contributions – bribes – from banks if they fail.
Thus, “CON”gress pays almost $800 billion in tax-payer money – not the federal government’s money, such a creature does not exist – to the banks with no oversight to spending.
Not only did they provide this golden parachute, but they allowed the banks to keep the original values of bad mortgages on their books.
What happens when you do not have to use the same accounting principles as private citizens? Fraud.
The banks continue – to this day – to keep their books cooked with mortgages worth far less in reality than they were originally. With no decrease in the value of their assets, what do you suppose happened to the money lent to them? Bonuses.
Corruption.
Poll
Who of the following is not on the Board of Governors?
5 comments
Hey! If you’re going to get rid of corrupt politicians and corruption in government what would be left?
Whoa there Mr. Stern, Maxine Waters was not working alone in creating the mortgage meltdown. It was a tag-team effort. In 2003 Congressman Barney Frank was the ranking Democrat on the Congressional Financial Services Committee, who blocked the Bush administration’s attempt at much closer oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Barney Frank stated his reasons for blocking closer oversight thus: “These two entities (Fannie and Freddie) . . . are not facing any kind of financial crisis . . . The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”
At the time, the Bush administration was attempting to transfer oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from Congress (which exercised such lax supervision that it amounted to no supervision) to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the Office of Thrift Supervision, offices where there are teams of accountants who expect the columns to add up. Barney Frank and friends were instrumental in making sure that the proposed transfer of supervision and stricter controls were not exercised.
In killing the Bush administration’s attempts at closer accounting and control of what Fannie and Freddie were up to; Barney Frank outlined his logic in his infamous “dice roll” statement: “I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness (In the regulation of Fannie and Freddie) that we have in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing.”
So there you have it folks. A perfect illustration of the doctrine of “unintended consequences”. A main reason the mortgage-backed securities market went completely unregulated was because the Democrats insisted upon rolling the dice with the national economy in order to promote their agenda of “affordable” and “subsidized” housing for one and all. The way this brilliant thinking went was that if we could just eliminate the mean-spirited, fuddy-duddy practices of balancing the books and responsible lending rules, then everyone could own their own home.
Now that worked out well, didn’t it.
Reg Indy calls for greater regulation and government oversight! Hallelujah!
Only in retrospect, of course.
We should’ve listened to the Bush administration everybody, because everything in their budgets was straightforward and the columns always “added up.”
@Chunk,
I haven’t “called for” anything, Chunk. I’m reciting the facts of what occurred leading up to the mortgage meltdown. And who bears primary responsibility there. Which the Obama administration has been trying to blame on the Republicans since day one.
But while we’re on the subject, let’s call for an accounting of where the trillions in Obama’s “stimulus” money has gone. It didn’t go to creating jobs, obviously.. Just watch, tomorrow night Obama will call for further “investment” in infrastructure and education. This man claims that he understands what is going on in this country since the November 2 election, but he is just too much of a socialist to get the picture. When the voters say no more spending, that actually means no more spending. And calling spending an “investment in our future” isn’t fooling anyone. Just count the number of times this tone-deaf president uses the term “investment” in our future tomorrow night. Which is always code for a ridiculous, unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer’s money. Generally to support the big unions, because they were Obama’s biggest campaign contributors.
****
Just a little timely support.
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=2373750
Comments are closed for this item.














Willfred Simpkin
Flag this comment