RMSMC
URL: http://www.collegian.com/index.php/article/2010/06/061610_mwcexpansion
Current Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 02:18:21 -0600
MWC affected by latest conference expansion
Changes to begin during 2011 season
The biggest conference shake up since the creation of the Big 12 Conference in 1996, when the Big 8 expanded, gaining Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech and Baylor, has been rocking the college football headlines for the past two weeks, and the train doesn’t look to be stopping anytime soon.
With CU-Boulder making the first official move on June 10, electing to leave the Big 12 for the Pacific 10 Conference, Nebraska and Boise State have since followed the example set by the Buffaloes, joining the Big Ten and Mountain West Conference, respectively.
With money being the largest factor driving conference expansion, one of the issues still on the table is the BCS, which gives automatic bids to the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Big East, Pac-10 and Southeastern Conference winners every season.
The MWC is one of five NCAA FBS conferences that does not receive an automatic bid to the BCS, but will be entering the third season of a four-year trial period with the BCS in 2010.
With TCU and Utah reaching BCS games the past two seasons, a shrinking MWC could ultimately affect the trial period, according to CSU Athletic Director Paul Kowalczyk.
“I think it could affect it, especially with the equity in it with the two years so far out of the four,” Kowalczyk said Tuesday. “It could be a negative depending on who left –– if anyone is to leave at all.”
Though no teams have left, UteZone.com, a member of the Rivals.com network, reported Tuesday that Utah has given notice to the MWC that they plan to join the Pac-10 and an official announcement could come as early as today.
When the Collegian contacted the MWC, Associate Commissioner Javan Hedlund said he had no knowledge of Utah leaving for the Pac-10.
“So far, we don’t know of any institutions leaving the Mountain West Conference, and until the University of Utah or another member of the Mountain West contact (Commissioner Craig Thompson), we cannot report on speculation,” Hedlund said.
With the MWC now sitting at 10 member institutions, Hedlund said the conference’s decision to expand further is in the hands of its Board of Directors, which is made up of the universities’ presidents.
With all conference moves that have been made and potential switches upcoming, none will take effect for the upcoming 2010 football season.
Boise State and Nebraska won’t start playing in their new conferences until 2011 and Colorado won’t play a Pac-10 schedule until 2012.
Sports Editor Matt L. Stephens can be reached at sports@collegian.com.
Poll
Who of the following is not on the Board of Governors?
8 comments
The MWC should look to Nevada to backfill Utah. They have a long history with Boise St. and a well known rivalry with UNLV. Their NC schedule already has them playing familar teams like Boise St., Cal, BYU, UNLV, and Colorado State.
When TCU and Utah leave the MWC and are at 8. They should join with the WAC and become the MWAC with 16 teams.
Kole . . . You are aware that the Mountain West teams BROKE AWAY from the WAC a few years ago because the 16-team conference was so unwieldy? The MW has prospered because it is a smaller, more nimble conference. Even if it were to go to 12 teams at some point, it would still be much better off than to re-create the 16-team monster WAC.
Kole-
They had that 15 years ago, it was called the WAC
I think MWC should look at Houston to strengthen the Texas tie and for a travel partner with TCU. If that doesn’t pan out, Fresno state.
Fresno is the better choice, geographically alone Fresno is the center of the WAC, the PAC10, and the MWC. Also, Fresno’s big home games always hits thier 42,000 capacity. Not too mention, thier baseball team dominates the WAC, and won a NC in 2008, that was also the second most viewed CWS game ever, at least according to my Fresno bloggers? It is also significant to Note they have a top multi-million dollar basketball arena. Nevada, would follow, but maybe even behind Houston.
TCU, BSU, AFA, BYU need to leave the MWC, its bottom feeders that are dragging them down in the AQ calculation and join up with Houston, SMU, Fresno, NV – If they want 10 then UTEP and UNLV. The BCS’s automatic qualifying formula is based on three criteria:
Finish in final BCS standings of the highest-ranked team. [The new conference would be equal to the MWC]
Average finish of all members in the final BCS poll in the computer rankings. [The new conference would be markedly better]
Number of teams in final BCS poll top 25, scored in a point system and adjusted for conference size. [The new conference is potentially better, but no chance to be worse than the MWC as currently composed]
Further, the new conference, as opposed to simply adding teams, improves TV Markets, loses poor performing teams, and gets the quality teams out of the awful MWC Channel deal.
Comments are closed for this item.














CS_MBA
Flag this comment