President Obama must choose to be like Carter or Clinton

Redistribution of earned income is a central tenet of Barak Obama’s belief system. This is the main “change” he intended to bring about, and he just cannot let it go. He has been dying to implement this since he was indoctrinated with socialist ideology way back at Columbia University.

After a little time in the real world paying their own bills and taxes, the vast majority of educated people outgrow Karl Marx’s absurd economic formula “From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.”

But not Barak Obama. He clings to it with a religious fervor. Which is why during his state of the union address he stated his mistaken belief that the public is overwhelmingly rejecting his socialized medicine plan only because he “hadn’t explained it clearly enough.”

Oh, he’s explained it clearly enough all right. He’s explained cap and tax clearly enough, too. We understand him loud and clear. And we reject what he is saying.

But having been falsely told that he was brilliant every day of his life since he was first admitted into college courtesy of affirmative action; Barak Obama just can’t believe that the public is overwhelmingly rejecting his “brilliant” theories and plans. He doesn’t understand that everything he is saying is just a rehash of the same socialist propaganda that we ourselves already heard and read about in college.

Nothing new there. Same old recycled socialist clap trap.

Bill Clinton was a lot smarter than Barak Obama. That’s why he governed as a pragmatic, moderate liberal, not as a socialist. Bill Clinton also had the very astute Dick Morris as his chief political adviser.

While Barak Obama only has Tweedledee and Tweedledum (David Axlerod and Rahm Emanuel) who come up with such impenetrably stupid political strategies as creating a white house Enemies List and spamming critics with “reeducation” propaganda. And openly exhibiting hostility toward the First Amendment, in order to “control” criticism. Way to endear this white house to the thinking public, guys.

There is also the problem of Obama’s dimwitted Attorney General Eric Holder, who insists upon trying the main enemy terrorist in U.S. custody exactly as if he had done noting but pass some bad checks. Unbeknown to Eric Holder, we actually are actively at war with these terrorists, our soldiers are being killed every day. So Holder’s obtuse trial plan is going over like a lead balloon.

Obama is going to go down to defeat even if he does try to “repackage” his misguided agenda with a new sales pitch.

Because the public already has an accurate read on where Barak Obama is coming from on the political spectrum. And he sure isn’t coming from the same place as Bill Clinton. Nor anywhere near it.

How great it would have been had we elected a first black president who was actually QUALIFIED for the job. I hope that day comes soon, and erases the memory of Obama’s disgraceful socialist attacks on this great democracy.

And here is the important distinction you are overlooking between Bush’s Medicare prescription drug coverage, and Barak Obama’s socialized medicine plan. The all-important difference regarding who pays for it.

Medicare coverage for the elderly is not “free”.

People who receive Medicare coverage when they are elderly have already been paying for it all of their lives through payroll deductions in their paychecks for 30 or 40 years. These payroll deductions are on a sliding scale. Those of us who earn more, pay more in. Those of us who earn less, pay less in. Nonetheless, we all pay into medicare for a very long time, before we reach age 65 and get anything out of it. Anyone who was not employed and hasn’t paid into Medicare, cannot get it for free. Presently these people who did not have the money previously deducted from their paychecks; have to pay $461 per month to receive Medicare coverage.

Therefore in order to receive Medicare benefits when one is elderly, one has to contribute to the system. Either by payroll deductions all one’s life, or by sizable monthly payments later in life.

In contrast, the socialized medicine plan Barak Obama is proposing has nothing to do with what one pays into the system. Nor whether one is too elderly to work. The entire point of Obamacare is to erase the distinction between those who work and pay their share into the system, and those who do not.

Under Obamacare, a 30 year old, able-bodied, three time loser ex- felon who has never paid a dime of income taxes nor medicare payroll deductions in his life, will receive absolutely free medical care under Barak Obama’s socialized medicine plan. When he is 30, not when he is over 65. Not just emergency medical care (which he receives free already) but for chiropractors, tranquilizers, Viagra, and the works.

And you and I and the rest of the responsible people will be paying for this able-bodied miscreant. We will be paying for all of our own coverage exactly as we are now, and we will also be paying for full coverage for the menace to society, as well. Multiply these costs we are picking up for him by 15 million or so people, and you have the picture.

As the majority of the public has indicated by their outrage, the glaring difference between the parties vis a vis socialism “is a difference in degree so great, that it amounts to a difference in kind.” Thus the popular rebellion.

So for a lone few to claim that unlike the majority, they themselves are unable to distinguish the difference between the two positions; is tantamount to proclaiming oneself to be thick as a plank.