Political correctness or repression?
by Josh Phillips
The Rocky Mountain Collegian
Josh Phillips
No doubt you’ve heard of the raging controversy generated by the “Cowboys vs. Indians” Facebook group created by Ben Margolit, a student here at CSU.
If you haven’t heard of it, suffice to say the campus has exploded in a fervent whirlwind of political correctness.
The “biggest social networking faux pas,” as the Collegian deemed it, led to a lengthy debate on the Lory Student Center Plaza as well as the Collegian’s Web site. Some said it was intolerant and ignorant. Others said it was harmless.
I’m more worried about the implications this issue carries in regard to our society as a whole. Political correctness, in all its filth and virulence, has reared its ugly head on our campus, permeating the media and tainting rationality with inconsiderate vehemence.
I agree that the notion of “Cowboys vs. Indians” is indeed polarizing and suggestive of a violent boundary between two distinct cultures. According to those offended, those who responded to Ben created the maelstrom of racism and ignorance.
Some of the comments were clearly racist, but political correctness, the social disease that has gripped our nation, has tightened its venomous coils around those who are otherwise upstanding examples of rationality.
The mature response to these racist comments would be to ignore them. The mature response would be to treat them as the back-alley sewage that the rest of us recognized.
Instead, in the spirit of absurd behavior, those who took offense decided that it was in their best interest to compound the problem by furthering the issue rather than merely sidestepping it altogether.
The Collegian cannot contest its contribution to this veritable accumulation of absurdity. The article on Feb. 5, titled “‘Cowboys v. Indians’ event sparks tense race talks,” highlighted only the most radical and insulting comments. Instead of propagating an environment of open dialogue, it instead attempted to instill anger and a desire for retribution.
And action is the ultimate goal of political correctness. It actively seeks retribution, as displayed in the Collegian, and assumes that one group should maintain power over another while working under the guise of fairness and equality.
We are a generation that has been born under the iron fist of political correctness, which implies that we are obligated to comply with the unreasonable demands of the minority. We are expected to dispose of rational contemplation and succumb to the wishes of a few. We are expected to believe that their voices carry more weight because their ancestors suffered in a time when suffering was the norm.
If that’s the case, then should I expect all those of British heritage to pay my family of Irish descent reparations for the atrocities their ancestors inflicted upon my ancestors? The British were notorious for engaging in slave trading during the 17th century, and the Irish were among those oppressed.
Why is my demand any less reasonable than the demands of others whose ancestors were oppressed?
Last week, CSU President Tony Frank sent an e-mail to the campus community, saying “Behavior that demeans another culture.” I challenge President Frank to explain exactly how wearing the garb of another culture is demeaning. This is a reasonable, rational inquiry, and if no sufficient response can be provided, I will assume that President Frank has fallen under the spell of political correctness that has overtaken our campus.
Political correctness is dangerous for several reasons. First, it explicitly defies open debate — admit it, discussions of sensitive topics are somehow always reduced to somebody being called a “Nazi” — and second, it offers a distorted portrayal of the minorities it claims to defend.
For example, the groups claiming offense to these mostly harmless actions have subjected themselves to ridicule by using PC tactics to portray themselves as helpless victims instead of strong, resolute activists of their cause.
I would suggest Ben Margolit keep his original Facebook group as a demonstration that political correctness cannot gain enough momentum to undermine free speech.
After stating my argument, I fully expect to be labeled a hate-monger, a white supremacist or an intolerant xenophobe. But to me, that just means that my dissenters have reached a wall of political correctness that prevents any semblance of rationality or logic to seep through its treacherous confines.
Josh Phillips is a senior business administration major. His contempt for political correctness appears Tuesdays in the Collegian. Feedback and hate mail can be sent to letters@collegian.com.
Please be respectful to others when commenting on our comment board. Comments that are decided to be overly offensive, off topic, derrogatory or unnecessarily cruel in nature will be erased.
All fields are required. Your email address will not be published.
recently added comments
![]() |
Lauren on Close to nine years later (1) |
![]() |
Registered Independent on Letter to the editor: Letter to the editor enraging, disgusting (11) |
![]() |
ttocS hplodnaR on ASCSU wants a voice (2) |
| 03/11/2010 |
How do you Chatroulette? |
| 03/04/2010 |
Binary Boys: Tecnology does not hate you |







collegian on facebook
collegian on twitter
rss feeds
The comments posted on this board are monitored, but we can not be held responsible for what others say.
Michael
02-09-10
6:20 AM
Hey Josh, it does my heart good to hear that from young Man who obviously was raised right by his parents and wasn’t brainwashed & programed by the extreme liberal culture machine. I’m a 55 year old conservative Vietnam vet, and I have seen how “political correctness” is ruing our culture & country. Stand up for yourself and your race and be proud, and lets take our culture & language back. Thanks for speaking the truth.
Terra
02-09-10
10:50 AM
I think Josh’s main point is not about race at all. It is more about how political correctness has served more to seperate us than to unite is. It is not about fighting for one’s race or any other idealism such as that. It is more about the fact that we are all humans, whether Native Americans, Hispanics, or White. It in the end shouldn’t matter, and when we are bound by policatical correctness we enter this realm of fear of saying anything.
stan oakland
02-09-10
3:14 PM
Thanks Josh for you insightfull column. We do have a Ethnics Studies department on campus and they are very good at explaining things like Political Correctness and White Privilege. Both of which you currently benefit from. Political Correctness is actually about respect for the other persons experience, eventhough it doesn’t mirror yours. Why would someone else taking offense at “cowboys and indians” cause you such outrage? Instead of complaining about the issue, why don’t you ask a Native American student why they feel the way they do about this? You might learn something, and that is why we go to school, ain’t it?
Zach
02-09-10
4:37 PM
Stan, isn’t eliminating stereotypes one of the goals of political correctness? So why are you automatically assuming that Josh Phillips is “benefitting from White Privelige”? Do you know him? Do you have classes with him and spend time at his residence? I doubt it, you’re making an assumption based on his skin color, funny how it’s okay to do it to a white person but if a white person says something about anyone with different skin color everyone gets offended and it’s politically incorrect.
I’m white, and NO ONE has ever given me a hand for anything. My dad is white, he came from the ghetto. He had to do this amazing thing called WORK to get himself out of it. No one helped him except himself. So stop assuming that all white people benfit from this “White Privelige” that honestly usually translates to “Hard Worker”.
If you actually read the whole column, you’d realize that Mr. Phillips is NOT outraged by this sole issue. He seems to be aggravated that every time a white person does anything that includes a different culture in any way, it’s somehow politically incorrect. All that political correctness is doing is making huge issues out of nothing. I don’t hear Irishmen complaining on St. Patrick’s Day when everyone is wearing green and clovers, but then again they’re white so if they did then they’d just be idiots right? Because we all know nothing bad ever happened to white people…
How the hell does Josh benefit from political correctness by the way? That makes no sense.
Stan ain't the man
02-09-10
4:44 PM
Stan, this here is America… ain’t it? Apparently Josh has the right to be deeply offended about whatever he wants. Despite his apparent whiteness, and your brilliant powers of observation, Josh gets the same rights that you get, and the same opportunities. I didn’t detect “outrage” in Josh’s column but maybe you have some special insight or nuanced look into his psyche that I don’t have. Don’t count that as privilege though, someone might attack you for it. Josh, and the rest of us, have heard plenty from supposed Native Americans (how can we know in online posts) about their “feelings” on this issue. What we have learned, in spite of being at an institutional of higher education, is that some people will play the victim card any chance they get. No ill-will was meant, no evil was done, no laws were broken, no hate groups formed mobs. No. Nothing was done except the idea floated that students dress like Native Americans as a fun way to show school spirit during a game against a team who’s students dress like cowboys. Now, I’m not a cowboy, but I’ll bet there is one somewhere who wishes those students would stop mocking him with their evil roll playing dress-up. My guess is, there is an ancestor of a viking somewhere who would like to pillage and plunder Bret Favre’s home. Maybe Johnny Depp should stop dressing like a pirate. And yes, I get that native Americans were mistreated, but how is dressing like them a poke in the wound? It is thin skinned and disgraceful to witness college students, of any skin color, afforded an education somehow, acting as though someone has just been lynched. And on a personal note, Stan, you don’t know Josh’s history, his family’s, or his ancestors’, but your comments show your complete ignorance, intolerance, and disgusting lack of integrity as you, yourself, attack someone you most likely know nothing about. It doesn’t take school to learn some lessons, Stan. There’s my white privileged point of view. It’s a great day to be an American, ain’t it?
Montana Mike
02-09-10
10:39 PM
Josh, this is one of the most insightful and thoughtful articles in a college newspaper that I have ever read. You have hit the nail directly on the head! Political correctness is an enemy of liberty and freedom, and you have so eloquently pointed that out. The left in this country is so overcome with sensitivity and fairness, that it has lost sight of common sense, fairness, and history. It gives this old man hope to see young men like you being able to overcome the politically correct environs you have been subjected to the last 15 years of schooling. You have not allowed yourself to be brain washed by the nonsense which pervades our education system in America. Your parents raised you well and taught you to think for yourself. That is a skill lacking in most of today’s youth. But what should we expect when high level administrators at our universities have been swallowed up by the cancer that is political correctness. Keep your chin up and hang in there. You are already better than your CSU high level administrators.
Montana Mike
Laure
02-09-10
11:00 PM
Josh, thank you for your article. I have regained my faith in the Collegian which was temporarily lost after reading about this “issue.” How sad is it that the two most memorable things Colorado State has is Falcon and a Facebook “racism” issue??? If that facebook event had been tailored to a “white trash” theme, I guarantee there would not be such a fuss about it! Granted, I’m not sure why one would do a white trash theme for a bball game but just using it as a comparison.
I was born and raised in Chicago-I have more minority friends than I do white friends. I have discussed with several of them their opinions of this (because of course, white people just don’t get it, right?) not one of them felt it was offensive.
One thing Josh’s article brought to my mind was the issue with many college teams using Native American tribes as mascots. Naturally, I know the most about University of Illinois. We can no longer wear any U of I apparel that has the Cheif logo on it-halftime shows usually consisted of a performance by the mascot, wearing regalia purchased from a Cheif. U of I used it to honor Native Americans, most notably the Illiniwek. But now that’s racist.
Look at what’s going on in Haiti. In Darfur. In the ghettos in Denver. This is a freaking facebook event that, despite the consequences, did not seem to intentionally hurt anyone. People need to stop whining about the petty things in life. All the facebook group leader needed was someone to send him a message and let him know he was possibly offending someone and then it was up to him to continue or remove his facebook thing. The beauty (or downfall) to free speech, is that everyone is granted it. Not just the politically correct minorities still griping about what happened to their ancestors.
P.S. Thank you Zach. My great grandparents came to the U.S. with just the clothes on their back. They were discriminated for being Irish or Italian. Guess what? I’m not whining about the horrid conditions they lived in and the prejudiced life they suffered so that I could have a much better one. I’m not holding a grudge that some ignorant American changed my last name cause they didn’t like it or couldn’t pronounce it. I celebrate my nationalities with my family and take no offense when someone makes a stereotypical Irish drinking joke. There’s an infinite amount of problems in this world that far surpass Facebook events.
Craig Hawley
02-10-10
2:11 AM
Wow what an articulate and well thought pout piece. I say we stop feeding the PC God’s of the liberal secular progressives and offend some one..lol
I am so sick of all this PC garbage. It is used to marginalize any opposing views. You say anything against their agenda and you are a hater or your accused of discrimination.
But it was heartening to see Americans in one of the bluest states in America , fire another shot heard round the world , by electing #41 Scott Brown to Ted Kennedy’s seat.
Josh you really do get it and I salute your being politically incorrect enough to write it.
Keep up the good work.
Madeline
02-10-10
6:48 AM
Ignoring racist comments is not mature; it takes a strong and brave person to speak up against racism.
I agree that it is a student’s First Amendment right to “dress like an Indian” at a sporting event, however ignorant. But let me exercise my First Amendment right and educate you on why it is wrong and has been an acceptable practice for way too long. And don’t tell me that I am being politically correct. I am being true to myself. I am sure that every Native person has his/her own reasons for why “wearing the garb of another culture is demeaning.” Here is mine:
I wear my regalia at powwows and sacred ceremonies. These are practices where participants act honorably. We treat our regalia with respect. Most items in my outfit have been made by my family and by other tribal members. I carry eagle feathers that have been handed down to me; these are very sacred. When I dance, I dance to honor my people. I dance for the healing of my people. I dance because it is one of the few traditions my family has left. Don’t take that away from me too. This is why dressing up like an Indian with fake feathers and war paint and acting out is trivializing and demeaning. It takes the significance out of my traditions. De-meaning. Don’t do it.
Suheet
02-10-10
9:16 AM
“I challenge President Frank to explain exactly how wearing the garb of another culture is demeaning.”
Josh, and all of you other angry posters, let me provide you an answer:
Is it okay to wear blackface? If you don’t know what I’m talking about, take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C45g3YP7JOk
By dressing up like an Indian to celebrate your basketball team, all you’re doing is dehumanizing another culture, making them into cartoon characthers. Dressing up like an Indian, headfeathers and all, wouldn’t be any different then slapping on that blackface and perpetuating all of the stereotypes associated with blacks.
jimmy
02-10-10
9:46 AM
Clearly Suheet and Madeline are completely oblivious to what racism “really” is.
We are not talking about racism in the context of the KKK or Brown v. Board of Education or The Civil Rights Act… What you are talking about is nitpicking to the point that merely wearing the clothes of another culture constitutes racism. Your assertions are insulting to those who “really” had to bear the burden of racism in America. Your little peeve is infinitesimal in comparison to the overall struggle people such as Frederick Douglas, Rosa Parks, Cesar Chavez, Martin Luther King, Jr, etc… experienced. To suggest that it is racist to dress up for a specific event in the clothing which is representative of the team icon is illusory. Not being able to vote because you are black is racism.
While you accuse others of being racist, it is important that you understand that people like yourselves while not being racist are blindly being racial. Your not discriminating, but you are bringing race into a discussion that should have nothing to do with race at all.
With your logic… every Native American who wears mainstream, “white privilege” clothes day-in and day-out is a racist because they are impersonating a culture in which they are not “technically” apart of… complete nonsense!
Zach
02-10-10
11:54 AM
Suheet, the fact that you posted something made by Spike Lee shows how much you love the racism argument. Spike Lee has to be one of the most racist and dumbest people in Hollywood. Like when he started the fight with Clint Eastwood over no black people being in his movie “Flags of our Fathers” when, if the idiot would have looked into history, he would’ve seen that black people were used in reserve positions during the Iwo Jima battle. He’s notoriously one-sided.
As for it being racist to dress up as a culture, I guess we need to have schools stop using “Culture Day” during Spirit Week, since it’s SO racist. If I see anyone greasing their hair for “50s Day” when I’m teaching I suppose I should be offended, because they would be “cartoonizing” what used to be in my culture. Since I’m from a small town I’m going to protest every time a non-cowboy wears a cowboy hat, since they really don’t know what being a cowboy is all about. I’m going to get really mad during St. Patricks Day since they are making fun of my ancestors. When people wear kilts during parades and aren’t of Scottish descent that is completely demeaning to my Scottish side. I’m also waiting for reprimands from the Russian people for stealing my land in Poland during WWII since I’m part Polish as well.
See how dumb all that sounds? Now think, that’s your arguments.
SoFine69
02-10-10
1:08 PM
And so we have the case of Josh Phillips.
Unable to empathize with the situation of Native American culture being stereotyped, belittled, and reduced in every way by American media culture, he has decided to demonize the issue by labeling it one of political correctness.
Josh, unable to understand why wearing the garb of another culture is demeaning, attracts a following of like-minded individuals who are plain sick of their paradigms being challenged. “Why can’t Indians just let it go”, they cry, “we have our rights to dress as we please!”
And yet so many of them lack the ability to distinguish the important difference between the situation their oppressed ancestors, usually Irish, faced when emigrating and that of the Native American’s.
Josh will continue to be a martyr for majority values, doubtfully ever attempting to see the world through the eyes of those unlike himself.
jimmy
02-10-10
1:30 PM
Not only racial, but an elitist too…
“And so we have the case of Josh Phillips.
Unable to empathize with the situation of Native American culture being stereotyped, belittled, and reduced in every way by American media culture, he has decided to demonize the issue by labeling it one of political correctness.
Josh, unable to understand why wearing the garb of another culture is demeaning, attracts a following of like-minded individuals who are plain sick of their paradigms being challenged. “Why can’t Indians just let it go”, they cry, “we have our rights to dress as we please!”
And yet so many of them lack the ability to distinguish the important difference between the situation their oppressed ancestors, usually Irish, faced when emigrating and that of the Native American’s.
Josh will continue to be a martyr for majority values, doubtfully ever attempting to see the world through the eyes of those unlike himself.”
Hilarious!
common sense
02-10-10
1:40 PM
“…unable to understand why wearing the garb of another culture is demeaning,”
So is Barrack Obama demeaning other cultures when he puts on the traditional clothes to “respect” other cultures? e.g. Kenya
How about when Putin and Bush wore Chinese silk shirts during the Beijing Olympic celebrations?
…didn’t think so
SoFine69
02-10-10
2:14 PM
You are correct. They were not wearing it in a demeaning manner. Here is the primary distinction:
Were Obama, Bush, and Putin donning the clothing to participate in mock warfare, recreating the obliteration of a people? Or were they wearing it to honor the culture and show their respect for it?
“Cowboys vs Indians” is not serious. Dressing as an Indian has no serious intention of honoring the traditional garb of that culture. It inadvertently mocks the garb.
People pretending to be Indians for their own purposes, non-traditional in nature, mock the entire Native American culture.
jimmy
02-10-10
2:32 PM
““Cowboys vs Indians” is not serious”
Thank why the outrage?
Your contradictions and illusions about racism has been very entertaining…
Craig Hawley
02-10-10
11:19 PM
Hyper liberals worshipping hyper PC gods…..Appealing to uber idiots…..
We had a guy in race relations in the army we called SKI… He was polish and we all had nick names so no disrespect was meant. Any way we were talking about black white and Latino racism and the problems with it in the army. SKI pipes up that he wants to be considered a minority.
The black race relations officer asked why. SKI says because I am polish. The room broke up and the race relations officer actually said shut up you pollack….lol
The point is people are offended all the time. What next we will have tall guys with red hair and freckles claiming protected status as a oppressed minority.
I am so sick of this hyper PC garbage.
This is just harmless fun at a college game. Those who take offense need to grow up , recognize the difference between real racism and hi jinx and get a thicker skin.