Please pardon our dust. We are currently in the midst of launching Collegian Central beta for the summer! Please send any issues to digitalmedia@collegian.com.

Loading

Leave political correctness to the politicians

Opinion | 8 months ago

Have we gotten so afraid of offending people that we have stopped saying anything of consequence? I think we have. With every speech you hear — especially by the politicians of modern day — you will hear some very “inclusive language,” but you may also notice that within all of that talk of making everyone [...]

Leave political correctness to the politicians

Have we gotten so afraid of offending people that we have stopped saying anything of consequence?

I think we have. With every speech you hear — especially by the politicians of modern day — you will hear some very “inclusive language,” but you may also notice that within all of that talk of making everyone feel special, they haven’t really said anything.

They can’t take a stand on anything because, Lord forbid, they might offend someone, and that would mean losing votes. And that would be the end of the world.

So what is the difference between using “inclusive language” and being politically correct? I’m here to tell you right now: there isn’t one.

For those of you that may not be familiar with inclusive language, it means just what common sense tells you it does: use language that will include everyone, and avoid using words or phrases that leave people out.

It sounds good — in theory. However, in practice it has gotten to the point of stupidity.

“Hey, guys.” It’s a common phrase uttered by men and women alike on a daily basis, no? And yet inclusive language tells me that I just excluded all females.

How about the term “sportsmanlike conduct?” Inclusive language is telling me that this is a term that can only be applied to men. “All men are created equal” means that women are chopped liver. Does anyone else find this ridiculous?

As a female, never have any of the above phrases offended me, and I don’t think I’m alone.

Can we take a step back and learn to actually say something of consequence, instead of being so concerned with being politically correct?

We have been preached to by everyone and their mother to the point that we are expected to be tolerant of everything except intolerance. Things that I don’t agree with, I am at least expected to be tolerant of.

Who says? Who was the first to say that tolerance is the new black? Because I don’t agree.

I admire people that will take a stand. I admire people that will defend their beliefs. I admire people that will say what they want, even if that means excluding people.

Politicians are not the only ones that have failed to take a stand on anything. We, as the American people, are so afraid of another person taking offense to something that comes out of our mouths that we have become a people with a language of fluff vocabulary.

Why do you say “um” and “ah” and “like” every other word? Because you have been trained to think about everything twice before you say it, to make sure it’s inoffensive.

I, for one, would love it if someone actually said what’s on their mind. If someone out there would actually say what they think, instead of what they have been trained and programmed to say.

Screw inclusive language and political correctness. Say what you mean and mean what you say.

As we watch the politicians on TV recite their speeches that have been combed over again and again in the interest of gaining votes, remember that they aren’t the only ones that have failed to say anything worth listening to. If you want to make an impact on anyone, stop walking on eggshells around people’s feelings.

I was listening to a man not too long ago that was a newly converted Christian. He had been a Muslim, growing up in his father’s mosque and facing Mecca when he prayed. Then he met a friend who showed up wearing a “Jesus Saves” T-shirt when he asked him to church.

He later said, “I’m not a Christian because my friend tiptoed around my feelings. I am a Christian because he confronted me.”

Confront people. Maybe they’ll take offense, but is that really the end of the world? Worst case scenario of saying what you want is that people’s feelings might be bruised. Best case scenario: you can make a difference in someone’s life.

Don’t be afraid to take a stand and defend that stand. Say things that are worth listening to. Leave political correctness to the politicians.

Brittany Jordan is a sophomore Psychology major. Her column appears every other Tuesday in the Collegian. Letters and feedback can be sent to letters@collegian.com.

  • EC

    I agree that political correctness is very overblown right now, particularly among college students, but your contention that politicians are using inclusive language just shows that you’re not paying attention to politics. Mitt Romney just wrote off 47% of the country as lazy slobs who he “will never convince to take personal responsibility for themselves.” The Occupy movement again strikes an us and them division between the 99% and the 1%. Republicans have for years referred to the “real America” – discounting anyone who lives in a city or on a coast. Again, I agree with your general feelings, but politicians are a far cry from using inclusive language.

  • Isobella

    Ah yes, political correctness. Or in other words: if you have an opinion, ANY opinion for that matter, you will soon be called an “extremist”, or better even, a “nazi”. Political correctness is nothing but the complete lack of an opinion out of fear to be stigmatised by what is considered “mainstream”. The result is complete self-censorship, and nothing could be more damaging to truth and the freedom of speech.

  • oh please

    Translation for this article: “People are so stupid because they don’t like it when I act like a bigot.”

    There is nothing wrong with letting people be who they are and recognizing that through language use. There is nothing terrible about thinking before you speak.

    Why should people be confrontational instead of cooperative? Your poorly-written anecdote about the man who converted to Christianity seems to be the only example you use to illustrate this idea. What needs to be confronted, exactly? The dreaded fact that someone might be different than you, or that he is different from his Christian friend?

    I use inclusive language because I am sick to death of people like you who are okay with making others feel invisible. I use inclusive language out of compassion for people who are marginalized and ignored by those who have the most social power and cultural force in this country, which is reflected in the language we use. Language is beautifully adaptable; why not change the way we use language so that it echoes equal respect for everyone?

    Words have a strong impact on how we formulate opinions, and I choose a lexicon that reinforces an ideal of equity. It is disappointing that your ideal seems to be aggression. What power trip are you on that you want to exclude others so badly?

    Brittany, consider for a moment why you feel entitled to be callous instead of caring. Think about where this sense of unfounded superiority comes from.

    • Brittany

      oh please,
      As much as you seem to disagree with my opinion, you did exactly what I’m asking college students to do. You took a stand and defended that stand, without worrying about offending me. As much as you seem to think that you are the opposite of me, we’re more alike than you seem to think. (it’s not a particularly bad thing, either).
      I am not asking people to go around and be the biggest jerks possible, just because they can. I am telling people that if they are offended by a term such as “sportsmanlike”, they need better things to worry about.
      As to your comment about me being confrontational, you seemed to have no problem confronting me. You don’t know who I am, so who are you to say that I’m callous and uncooperative? Those that live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
      In your above response, your said tendency towards inclusivity was apparently put on a shelf. You certainly had no problem calling me out- excluding me. My power trip? I wasn’t the one directly calling out an individual, was I?
      Where is your ideal of equity in telling me that you and your beliefs are superior to me and mine? Take a look in the mirror before labeling me as aggressive. I don’t think I’m the one with the unfounded superiority.
      That being said, I appreciate the feedback. You did exactly what I asked people to.

      • Courtney

        Language is hurtful, even if you are not personally offended by it on a daily basis. Language leads to systematic oppression, it hurts you on a organizational level if nothing else. I worry about language because it is they beginning, it is something that everyone can change and make the world a much nicer place to live in. Language also leads to action. Language hurts and is dangerous, language also changes the way people think about an issue, etc.
        Not using inclusive language excludes others from the situation. Saying ‘hey guys’, does not acknowledge anyone who does not identify as a guy, thus deeming everyone else as not as important. We come from an unequal society were patriarchy, among many other things (heterosexism, whiteness, ablebodied, etc.) is deemed the norm. Thus if you are outside the norm you are not seen on a level playing field and language just perpetuates the unequal standing in society.
        We (myself and ‘oh please’) are not like you as we are standing up for underrepresented individuals in society, who are often put down on, while you on the other hand in my belief are just perpetuating the master narrative that oppresses others.
        I would suggest that you get a little bit more educated on this topic and its’ consequences before you state your opinion in the college newspaper, as I know that it is an opinion that is not shared by many on campus.
        This article is yet another reason why I continually feel let down and unrepresented or respected by The Collegian.

  • getoveryourself.

    You know, it is possible to make a point…while being inclusive. You just have to be intelligent! Sorry I’m not sorry about building a community where everyone feels valued. Get over your mountain of privilege, sorry you’re upset…but I feel like you can deal with the word “folks” instead of “guys”. Get over it! Not sure if you went to the diversity symposium keynote, Sherman Alexie spoke. This dude is all for social justice and inclusive language, but probably offended tons of people. However, the best thing he said was, “Tradition is dangerous.” Because tradition tends to keep you stuck in a rut…therefore, get out of the tradition and speak to ALL people. It’s not going to harm you, I freaking guarantee it.

  • Rachel

    You misunderstand the difference between individual confrontation and disagreement, and systemic devaluation of entire populations. It is however problematic when bigots hide their bigotry and that is because it becomes harder to address and deal with. Now the worst case scenario of bigotry, is hardly bruising. Bigotry has created a world, especially in the U.S were some people have access to housing, schooling, opportunities, food, healthcare, etc, and others do not. I recommend you spend some time doing self-reflection when people call you out on your ‘politically incorrect’ statements. It probably means that some ideology or thought you are holding is oppressive, hateful, and wrong. Rather than being offended by that you should work on yourself to try and move beyond those sorts of thoughts and ideologies. Try to create a world in which you don’t exert your power and privilege to the extent you are hurting and oppressing others. That should be your goal, rather than crying foul at people hiding their true thoughts. Some thoughts, should remain unthought, unspoken, and unacted upon. Sort of like this article.

  • Ed McMahon

    “So what is the difference between using “inclusive language” and being politically correct? I’m here to tell you right now: there isn’t one.”

    I’m here to tell you that the words “exclude” and “offend” are not to be used interchangeably because they mean different things.

  • Jared Longmore

    Brittany,

    I think you’re misunderstanding a fundamental point — that to a large degree you have privilege that a lot of other people in this world don’t have. Unfortunately, it’s really easy to misunderstand this position of privilege as one that everyone in the world shares. As Rachel begins to point out, that’s simply not the case.

    The purpose of inclusive language goes much deeper than just offending you when a teacher — I myself often catch myself doing this — refers to an entire class as “guys”. Others have eloquently stated that “language is beautifully adaptable,” and, I’m not sure which school of philosophical thought you belong to, but I’d argue that language constructs meaning (not the other way around). I assume that the reason you got into journalism was because you also agreed that words have a certain power to them. I’d suggest doing some further reading into the issue, because the systemic use of “exclusive” language creates a culture where injustice is suddenly justified.

    Sure, confrontation can be necessary at times, but it seems to me like you’re saying passive aggressiveness, and being inclusive/considerate are the same things. I’d encourage you to think about you’re preaching. To me, it’d be like a person running into the LSC plaza and screaming, “I hate all people of color,” for the sole purpose of eliciting the correct response. Sounds problematic to me. Sometimes we need to take a step back, think deeply on the issue, check our prejudices at the door, and move to a place of understanding.

    Just my perspectives…

    Jared Longmore

Cost of college tuition out of control

Opinion | 17 hours ago

This coming school year we are all in for a surprise with a 9 percent tuition increase which brings the cost of tuition up to $7,494 for the fall and spring semesters of the 2014 school year. Rate increases are a problem seen with all colleges. In the last 13 years, tuition at CU has [...]

The futility of gun-control

Opinion | 1 month ago

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”  The Second Amendment is very clear on how guns should be handled. The definition of infringed by Merriam-Webster dictionary is, “Act so as to limit or undermine.” After [...]

Fair Trade Lovin’

Opinion | 1 month ago

Fair Trade is a non-profit organization that represents a brand of products being grown and produced on farms where farmers and workers get paid a fair wage for their labor. Along with fair wage and no child labor, Fair trade promotes sustainable farming in disadvantaged communities by educating producers to improve community development, and producing [...]

You are this paper

Opinion | 1 month ago

It was 10:30 p.m. two Saturdays ago and a couple of roommates had made their usual pit stop at our place before heading out into another wild Fort Collins weekend. No, it was nothing special. Just a bunch of burnt-out college juniors getting ready for one last hurrah before feeling the full weight of finals [...]

Pay attention to club sports

Opinion | 1 month ago

Over the weekend the CSU Women’s Lacrosse Team became national champions, defeating the University of California, Santa Barbara. They didn’t lose a single game, making their championship win the crown jewel in a perfect season. The problem is, not everyone really knows that CSU does have championship teams like the lacrosse teams. Anonymity is a problem that [...]

A study abroad attitude for summer

Opinion | 1 month ago

Summer is a time rife with possibilities. Three long months of freedom from the school year yawn before us, beckoning for us to do something besides watch reality TV. Even if a summer job or a few classes interrupt the blissful orb of summer, there are always those moments of apparent “nothing to do:” that [...]

Reflections of a professional theatre goer

Opinion | 1 month ago

The first play I ever saw was a production of “Cabaret” at the Community College of Aurora when I was 10-years-old. Now, if you are familiar with the musical, you may wonder why a 10-year-old would be at such a production. My friend’s mom was the costume designer for the show and they invited me [...]

Confessions from your Friday Columnist

Opinion | 1 month ago

Before you read this last piece of mine, I have to sincerely thank you, my readers, for putting up with my columns all year long. That being said, there are still some things I need to get off my chest before I graduate and enter the real world, where I’ll be a nameless, faceless and [...]

What is your freedom of speech costing you?

Opinion | 1 month ago

I am a diehard Minnesota Vikings fan. Even though they consistently lose and still refuse to draft a decent quarterback, I will continue to wear my jersey and braids with pride. So let’s just say that I wasn’t particularly surprised when I got word that the Vikings released their punter, Chris Kluwe, out of his [...]

Capitalistic companies should not be our ‘vehicle’ for space travel

Opinion | 1 month ago

Late last month, a Netherlands based organization began accepting applications for sending people to Mars. Exciting right? Well actually, it’s more of a mixed bag. Especially when one considers what the future of humanity has in store for it by allowing capitalistic based interests be our representatives in space exploration. Certainly there is great excitement [...]

Still reading Tony Frank's emails . . . and I've graduated . . . something might be wrong with my summer.